Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 106
04/04/2011 08:00 AM House EDUCATION
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
Presentation(s): Superintendent Anchorage School District | |
HB199 | |
HB198 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 199 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 198 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 199-FUNDING FOR STATE BOARDING SCHOOLS 8:31:22 AM CHAIR DICK announced that the next order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 199, "An Act amending the funding for statewide residential educational programs." 8:32:36 AM ELIZABETH SWEENEY NUDELMAN, Director, School Finance and Facilities Section, Department of Education and Early Development (EED), clarified that the statute covered the programs that operated for the full school year. 8:33:50 AM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI asked how the amounts in the statute were originally established. 8:34:24 AM MS. NUDELMAN replied that these were stipend rates from another program. REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI, noting that the stipend amount would be determined on a regional basis with an established cap, asked about money that was granted but was then found to be not necessary. 8:35:11 AM MS. NUDELMAN replied that it had never been an issue. 8:35:31 AM REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE inquired about the actual costs of the housing and food programs. 8:35:40 AM MS. NUDELMAN offered to provide the information to the committee. REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE stated that, as the programs had been operating for a number of years, it would be good to have an understanding of the actual costs. 8:36:47 AM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON, directing attention to Exhibit F [Included in members' packets], asked if EED agreed that the figures provided were accurate. 8:37:57 AM MS. NUDELMAN said that EED had not reviewed the document, but she noted that the program costs had continually exceeded the cost of the stipend. 8:39:06 AM ERIC GEBHART, Superintendent, Nenana City School District, directed attention to page 2 of a handout titled "Nenana Student Living Center 2010 Actual Expenditures [Included in members' packets]. He pointed out that the revenues and expenses for the actual amount for 2010 and the budgeted amount for 2011 were listed side by side. He confirmed the revenue deficiency for 2010 of $704,868, and the projected deficiency in 2011 to be $819,593. CHAIR DICK asked where the operating money was obtained. MR. GEBHART replied that it was from foundation funding, and local funding from the city, among others. 8:41:19 AM REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT, referring to the budget document being discussed, noted that the expenses were for nine months, and he asked how many months the requested stipend would cover. MR. GEBHART replied that, although nine months were currently taken, a tenth month would be welcomed and was necessary. 8:42:13 AM REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE, referring to the budget document, inquired about the increase in wages, salaries, and benefits. MR. GEBHART, in response, said that there were increases in salaries and health insurance, as well as the addition of another staff. 8:43:07 AM CHAIR DICK pointed out that staff needs extended beyond the school year. 8:43:36 AM REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE, referring to the aforementioned cost increase for additional staff, asked if the number of students had also increased. MR. GEBHART replied that some services were currently not being met, including the need for a counselor and a certified person for academic support. 8:44:34 AM CHAIR DICK reported on his visit to the facility, and said that he had found it to be a bare bones operation with a need for additional staff. 8:45:14 AM CRAIG CULBERT, Assistant Superintendent, Galena City School District, reporting on the program costs, stated that the food cost for 255 students was $17,136, of which the state paid about $5800. He detailed that a four year grant, received through Senator Lisa Murkowski's office, would most likely not be renewed. 8:46:27 AM CHAIR DICK asked about the fuel costs. MR. CULBERT replied that about $1.1 million worth of fuel had been donated from the military, but that future costs would also need to be addressed. This would bring the deficit total to almost $2 million. 8:47:46 AM CHAIR DICK agreed that the bill would make time available to research a long term solution. MR. CULBERT said that EED had the valid costs for comparison. 8:48:56 AM CHAIR DICK closed public testimony. 8:49:17 AM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON moved to adopt Amendment 1, labeled 27- LS0594\B.1, Mischel, 3/21/11, which read: Page 1, following line 2: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Section 1. AS 14.16.200 is amended by adding a new subsection to read: (c) In addition to the programs eligible for reimbursement of costs under (a) of this section, the department may approve three district-operated statewide residential educational programs that began operating after July 1, 2011, for reimbursement of costs incurred by the district in operating the program under regulations adopted by the department." Page 1, line 3: Delete "Section 1" Insert "Sec. 2" 8:49:28 AM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI objected for discussion. 8:49:33 AM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON explained that proposed Amendment 1 would allow a procedure for EED to accept up to three applications and proposals for full year programs. 8:51:31 AM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI asked if there were any other boarding school programs between 2005 and 2011. 8:51:42 AM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON replied that some residential programs had been offered but not on a year around basis. He explained that the proposed amendment removed the restriction for any applicant who met all the qualifications, but did not require EED to accept any applications. 8:52:37 AM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI asked if the specified dates in the proposed amendment excluded any schools. 8:52:58 AM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON agreed that there was no intent to exclude, however, the date in the proposed amendment could be amended to encompass all the schools. 8:53:29 AM CHAIR DICK asked if the proposed amendment would affect the fiscal note and inhibit the bill's passage. REPRESENTATIVE SEATON offered his belief that the proposed amendment would not cause any changes, but that EED would be able to better answer. 8:54:41 AM MS. NUDELMAN opined that the proposed amendment would not increase the fiscal note, as EED would solicit proposals with stated criteria. 8:55:56 AM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON moved to adopt Conceptual Amendment 1 to proposed Amendment 1, which read: Page 1, line 6: Delete "July 1, 2011" Insert "January 1, 2005" 8:56:26 AM There being no objection, Conceptual Amendment 1 to proposed Amendment 1 was passed. 8:56:40 AM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI removed his objection to proposed Amendment 1. 8:56:46 AM REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE asked for an explanation as to how this would have a zero fiscal note. 8:57:23 AM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON, in response, said that proposed Amendment 1 merely stated that EED may solicit applications with a process for approval; hence, it was permissive, but not mandatory, language. He agreed that a future fiscal note to fund may be necessary. 8:58:30 AM The committee took a brief at-ease. 8:59:12 AM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON moved to adopt Amendment 1, as amended. 9:00:02 AM REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT objected and asked to clarify what was being added to the bill. He stated that there was no additional funding, as it merely stated that three more schools could be approved. 9:00:36 AM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON explained that proposed Amendment 1 removed the existing statutory restriction for adding eligible schools. He offered his belief that it should not require re- titling. 9:01:23 AM REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT asked if the process could lead to approval prior to FY 2012. REPRESENTATIVE SEATON replied that EED had testified that the process was lengthy, and that EED would not approve an unfunded program. 9:02:21 AM REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT opined that a long term outlook would reflect a return to the current stipend level after 2013. 9:02:50 AM MS. NUDELMAN explained that, at a future date, if new residential programs were added to the statute and funded via appropriation, then the costs would increase. REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT offered his belief that there were costs associated with this proposed amendment, even if they did not occur this year. 9:04:10 AM REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT removed his objection. The committee took a brief at-ease. 9:04:42 AM There being no further objection, Amendment 1, as amended, was passed. 9:05:15 AM REPRESENTATIVE KAWASAKI acknowledged that there was a current existing need, but he offered his belief that boarding schools had not yet been determined to be the best approach to the needs of Alaska education. He said that he would not oppose the bill. CHAIR DICK expressed his agreement. 9:06:34 AM REPRESENTATIVE PRUITT moved to report HB 199, as amended, out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSHB 199 (EDC) was reported from the House Education Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
Rep Seaton Conceptual Amendment.pdf |
HEDC 4/4/2011 8:00:00 AM |